viernes, 16 de diciembre de 2011

List of top consulting firms 2012


Following is a list of the top consulting firms around the world with such details as ranking, company name, website url, headquarters, year founded, approximate number of employees, male to female ratio, and other statistics. Being a top consulting firm do not means always prestige and do not bring quality and values automatically, but clients and job seekers of the consulting profession may be interested by these statistics.

Purpose: To summarize and provide beneficial statistical information about the consulting industry and provide quick access gateway to a list of the top consulting companies and websites.
Serving: Researchers, students, professionals, job seekers in the consulting industry and all who seek information about top consulting companies.

 

Disclaimer: We are not claiming any rights, responsibilites or ownership pertaining to creating, developing, designing, or programming any of the websites listed on this page. All websites listed on this page are publically available for viewing on the internet.

Rankings: Any ranking information regarding the listings above have been made by 3rd parties, organizations which make their ranking info available on public viewable pages free of charge. For this particular listing we have gathered inforamtion from various sources on the internet, including, cnn.com, vault.com, fortune.com and linkedin.com.

The 2011 Best Firms to Work For (according to Consulting Magazine):

 

The Best Consulting Firms to Work For 2011

  1. Bain & Company
  2. The Boston Consulting Group
  3. North Highland
  4. Point B
  5. Deloitte Consulting
  6. Slalom Consulting
  7. McKinsey & Company
  8. PwC
  9. Booz Allen Hamilton
  10. Huron Consulting Group
  11. Ernst & Young
  12. Accenture
  13. Crowe Horwath
  14. Monitor
  15. A.T. Kearney

The Best Small Consulting Firms to Work For 2011

  1. Stroud Consulting
  2. Impact Advisors
  3. Cask
  4. Vynamic
  5. Infinitive
  6. Fitzgerald Analytics
  7. Lenati
  8. Jabian Consulting
  9. PeopleFirm
  10. HiSoft (formerly Nouveon)
  11. Plus Consulting
  12. Meridian Compensation Partners
  13. Marakon
  14. SEI
  15. IBB Consulting Group

 

 

 

Rank

Consulting Firms

HQ

Industry

Type

# of
employees

Year
founded

Med
age

Male

Fe-

male

1

McKinsey & Company Greater New York City Area Management Consulting Partnership 15000 1926 29 67% 33%

2

The Boston Consulting Group, Inc Greater Boston Area Management Consulting Partnership 6000 1963 28 67% 33%

3

Bain & Company Greater Boston Area Management Consulting Privately Held 10000 1973 28 65% 35%

4

Booz & Company Washington DC Metro Area Management Consulting Privately Held 22000 1914 32 64% 36%

5

Deloitte Consulting LLP Greater New York City Area Financial Services Partnership 168000 - 29 61% 39%

6

Monitor Group Greater Boston Area Management Consulting Privately Held 1500 1983 29 63% 37%

7

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Greater New York City Area Accounting Partnership 17500 - 29 59% 41%

8

Mercer LLC Greater New York City Area Human Resources Public 18000 1937 34 51% 49%

9

Ernst & Young LLP Greater New York City Area Accounting Partnership 144000 - 29 59% 41%

10

Oliver Wyman Greater New York City Area Management Consulting Public 1001 - 30 70% 30%

11

Accenture Greater Chicago Area Management Consulting Public 177000 1989 30 67% 33%

12

IBM Global Business Services Greater New York City Area Information Technology and Services Public 300000 1911 34 76% 24%

13

KPMG LLP Amsterdam Area, Netherlands Accounting Partnership 137000 - 30 60% 40%

14

Towers Watson Greater Philadelphia Area Management Consulting Privately Held 6400 1934 34 52% 48%

15

AlixPartners, LLP Greater Detroit Area Management Consulting Privately Held 900 1981 35 77% 23%

16

A.T. Kearney Greater Chicago Area Management Consulting Partnership 2700 1926 30 68% 32%

17

Braxton Consulting Eurpe & Latin America Management Consulting Privately Held 250 1996 31 54% 46%

18

The Parthenon Group Greater Boston Area Management Consulting Privately Held 200 1999 28 62% 38%

19

Towers Watson - Financial Services Public 14000 - 34 53% 47%

20

L.E.K. Consulting London, UK Management Consulting Partnership 900 1983 28 70% 30%

21

FTI Consulting, Inc. Washington DC Metro Area Management Consulting Public 3500 1982 32 71% 29%

22

Alvarez & Marsal Greater New York City Area Management Consulting Privately Held 1600 1983 33 73% 27%

23

NERA Economic Consulting Greater New York City Area Management Consulting Public 600 1961 27 61% 39%

24

Capgemini Paris Area, France Information Technology and Services Privately Held 91000 1967 32 77% 23%

25

Navigant Consulting, Inc. Greater Chicago Area Management Consulting Public 2500 1983 32 62% 38%

26

Huron Consulting Group Greater Chicago Area Management Consulting Public 2000 2002 30 61% 39%

27

Hewitt Associates Greater Chicago Area Outsourcing/Offshoring Public 25000 1940 32 55% 45%

28

Roland Berger Strategy Consultants - Management Consulting Partnership 2100 1967 28 72% 28%

29

ZS Associates Greater Chicago Area Management Consulting Privately Held 1400 1983 27 72% 28%

30

CRA International, Inc. Greater Boston Area Management Consulting Public 800 1965 33 65% 35%

31

Arthur D. Little Paris Area, France Management Consulting Privately Held 1000 - 30 75% 25%

32

Kurt Salmon Associates Greater Atlanta Area Management Consulting Public 700 1935 33 63% 37%

33

LECG San Francisco Bay Area Management Consulting Public 1200 1988 34 69% 31%

34

Gallup Consulting District of Columbia Management Consulting Privately Held 2000 - 27 60% 40%

35

Aon Consulting Worldwide Greater Chicago Area Management Consulting Public 6300 1983 36 52% 48%

36

BraxtonTechnology Europe, Asia & Latin America Technology Consulting & Services Privately Held 219 2005 26 74% 26%

37

Cornerstone Research San Francisco Bay Area Legal Services Privately Held 201 1989 27 61% 39%

38

Corporate Executive Board Washington DC Metro Area Management Consulting Public 2000 1979 28 50% 50%

39

Hay Group Greater Philadelphia Area Management Consulting Privately Held 2600 1943 32 47% 53%

40

Analysis Group, Inc. Greater Boston Area Management Consulting Privately Held 500 1981 30 62% 38%

41

Milliman, Inc Greater Seattle Area Insurance Privately Held 2000 1947 35 62% 38%

42

Zolfo Cooper Greater New York City Area Financial Services Privately Held 75 - 31 67% 33%

43

Mars & Co - - - - 1979 - - -

44

The Advisory Board Company Washington DC Metro Area Hospital & Health Care Public 1000 1979 28 43% 57%

45

Putnam Associates Greater Boston Area Management Consulting Privately Held 50 1988 26 64% 36%

46

First Manhattan Consulting Group Greater New York City Area Management Consulting Privately Held 51 1980 26 76% 24%

47

IMS Health Incorporated Greater Philadelphia Area Pharmaceuticals Public 10000 1954 34 57% 43%

48

Buck Consultants Greater New York City Area Human Resources Public 1900 1916 38 55% 45%

49

Giuliani Partners LLC Greater New York City Area Management Consulting Privately Held 11 2002 45 79% 21%

50

Archstone Consulting Greater New York City Area Management Consulting Privately Held 250 2003 34 63% 37%

 

lunes, 14 de marzo de 2011

Knowledge-related Motives.

Recent research findings suggest that knowledge assets both push and pull SMEs into international markets.There are also related findings from a number of OECD countries (Sweden, Ireland, and Canada) and non-OECD economies (Chile, India and Indonesia) on the internationalization triggering effects of knowledge aspects, including R&D investment, innovation capabilities, unique product or technology, management, and language skills; and firm resource base, as indicated by such proxies as size, age, and experience. The push dimension pertains to the importance of managersprevious international experience and related management capacity factors, as observed in studies among Canadian firms, Spanish firms, and Swedish firms. Search for knowledge assets may also pull SMEs into international markets, as suggested by Kocker and Buhl's findings that firms internationalize to obtain missing know-how required to maintain their lead in technological development.

Growth Motives.

Growth Motives.

Growth opportunities associated with international markets were identified as a key driver of firm internationalization in several recent studies. Orser et al. (2008), for example, reports say that after allowing for the impacts of firm size and sector, Canadian legal firms whose owners had expressed growth intentions were more than twice as likely to export, than those whose owners did not indicate growth ambitions. Firms‟ overseas venturing decision also seems to be motivated by a need for business growth, profits, an increased market size, a stronger market position, and to reduce dependence on a single or smaller number of markets. The possibility of growth in other markets and increased profit opportunities from international expansion were highlighted as key stimuli for exporting among the Australian, British, Spanish, Swedish, and US firms investigated in recent studies.

jueves, 24 de febrero de 2011

How to open a Non-Resident Accounts in Thailand

How to open a Non-Resident Accounts in Thailand

It is mandatory for International lawyers to know how to open a non-resident account in Thailand. To be considered the following facts.

Exchange control in Thailand is governed principally by the Exchange Control Act B.E. 2485 (A.D. 1942) (the “Exchange Control Act”) and Ministerial Regulation No. 13 B.E. 2497 (A.D. 1954), together with the Notifications and Notices issued there under. The Bank of Thailand is charged by the Ministry of Finance with the administration of foreign exchange in Thailand.

Presently, 13 Thai commercial banks and 18 foreign bank branches and one company (Asia Credit Public Company Limited) are registered and authorized by the Bank of Thailand. Subject to the conditions prescribed by the Bank of Thailand, non-residents are generally allowed to open and maintain both Thai Baht and foreign currency accounts with authorized agents (i.e. authorized banks and an authorized company) in Thailand.

domingo, 9 de enero de 2011

Hong Kongs Taxes and worldwide consequences

The press recently wrote about Hong Kong's stamp duty increase in reaction to the yuan renminbi influx. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority reported that yuan renminbi deposits increased 29 percent at the end of November, compared with October 2010, and that year on year, at the end of October yuan renminbi deposits in Hong Kong increased 246 percent. If you want to see what this means, come to Hong Kong and look at prices! That's why Hong Kong had to do something.
Effective November 20, Hong Kong's new stamp duties covered all properties resold within 24 months of acquisition. This levy is enforced even if there is no sale but the property changes hands by way of a gift - if the transferee sells that property within 24 months or if it is an inheritance and the inheritor sells within 24 months. Even if the buyer made the wrong gamble and has to sell at a loss (unlikely unless there is a bubble burst), the stamp duty will still be in effect.
There are three levels of Hong Kong stamp duty:
15 percent if the property is held for six months or less;
10 percent if the property is held between six and 12 months; and
5 percent for property held between one and two years.

I doubt that this will have any real effect on the Hong Kong property market. The South China Morning Post reported on January 29 that prices soared so much last year that luxury flats are now 112 percent more expensive than their comparables in London, Moscow, and New York. A lot of people cannot afford to live in Hong Kong.
What the price spiral is doing, though, is creating another humongous Hong Kong surplus - to the tune of HKD 75 billion when the fiscal year-end of March 31 comes. Stamp taxes are indeed profitable. What will happen because of this? I'd bet that Hong Kong's corporate tax rate will go down from 16.5 percent to 15 percent. We won't know until the Hong Kong budget is presented on February 23.
The Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (HKICPA) issued its recommendations to the Hong Kong financial secretary on January 28. Instead of asking the government to give tax rebates, the HKICPA asked that the surplus be used to fund an otherwise nonexistent old-age fund and to raise allowances (tax exemptions) by 20 percent for dependent parents, grandparents, brothers, sisters, and the disabled.
To encourage hiring of disabled persons, the HKICPA asked the government to grant employment tax credits of 150 percent. It also asked for a reduction of the corporate tax rate to 15 percent for corporate income under HKD 2 million.
A year ago, Hong Kong was neither on the OECD blacklist nor the white list. I called Hong Kong gray. Boy, did I get flack for that one even though it was 100 percent correct. As of today, Hong Kong has 18 double tax avoidance agreements with tax information exchange agreements. The most recent signings were with France, Japan, New Zealand, and Switzerland, and more are on the way. Yet no matter how many are signed, Hong Kong simply will not catch up with Singapore in this area. What is notable, though, is that neither Hong Kong nor Singapore has anything on the books with the United States - and a U.S. double tax avoidance agreement for either jurisdiction appears highly unlikely.

lunes, 20 de diciembre de 2010

SME Internationalization

This realisation was at the heart of the 2007 OECD-APEC study on Removing Barriers to SME Access to International Markets, which provided general findings on the major barriers to SME internationalization as perceived by SMEs and policymakers in OECD and APEC member economies. The need to obtain a greater depth of understanding and an updated view of the issues raised by the OECD-APEC study provided a raison d'ĂȘtre for this follow-up project. Internationalization and international entrepreneurship among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) has remained a topic of considerable contemporary relevance, principally owing to the observed growth effects of cross-border venturing, and the demonstrated capacity of SMEs to drive economic development at national, regional, and global levels (European Commission, 2007). Other value adding features include the additional focus on motivations for SME internationalization ; the coverage of recently available documentation from economies involved in the OECD enlargement (Chile, Estonia, Israel, Russia, and Slovenia) and enhanced engagement process (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, and South Africa); and the sub-national and sectoral insights offered on SME internationalization barriers, motivations and support programs.